Student
Learn how to read a witness card, what our numbers mean, and where block-level famous passages differ from the word census.
Claims & evidence
This page maps common public claims to what Illustrative Manuscripts actually contains — open CNTR transcriptions, a bounded 1–400 CE Greek NT slice, and hand-curated Qurʾān catalog data. It is meant to help students, researchers, debaters, and apologists stay precise: neither inflating our counts nor pretending the site settles every tradition-scale debate.
Pick a lane — each card links into pages we already publish. Nothing here replaces CNTR, INTF, or critical editions; it routes you to honest slices of evidence on this site.
Learn how to read a witness card, what our numbers mean, and where block-level famous passages differ from the word census.
Download the open census, read methodology, and cite CNTR/INTF for primaries — cite us for the illustrative collation slice only.
Check claim discipline before arguing from our charts — then use Famous passages, Variants, Uthmanic rasm, and Coverage honesty together.
Verdicts describe what this site's data and scope can support — not every theological or historical dispute in the field. For citations and BibTeX, see Cite & learn.
“Nobody has counted New Testament variants.”
Partially truePeter Gurry (NTS 2016) estimates on the order of ~500,000 readings across the whole Greek tradition — a extrapolation, not a hand count of every manuscript. Our site does publish a mechanical count, but only for word-aligned disagreements vs SR GNT in extant letters of our 1–400 CE CNTR witness slice — not the full ~5,700+ manuscript tradition.
“The New Testament text is completely unknown before late manuscripts.”
Unsupported / overclaimWithin our frozen window, substantial Greek material survives from the second and third centuries (papyri) plus fourth-century codices such as 01 and 03. That does not recover every verse in every book from every century — but it falsifies the blanket claim that nothing early exists.
“By about 400 CE the Greek New Testament text is largely recoverable.”
Supported (within our scope)Standard critical-edition framing (and our site’s own scope statement) treats the fourth-century major codices plus earlier papyri as the backbone for reconstructing the Greek text — while still not counting every later Byzantine variant or replacing NA28/ECM apparatus judgments.
“P66, P75, 01, and 03 lack the Pericope Adulterae (John 7:53–8:11).”
Supported (within our scope)In CNTR transcriptions in our corpus, that block is marked absent; narrative runs from 7:52 to 8:12 in those witnesses. Later Byzantine copies insert the pericope — a different story from our early slice.
“Mark originally ended at 16:8 in the earliest complete Greek codices in our window.”
Supported (within our scope)Codex Sinaiticus (01) and Codex Vaticanus (03) end Mark at 16:8 in the main Greek tradition represented in CNTR; the longer ending 16:9–20 is a later supplement in the manuscript record. Textual critics still debate composition history — our data support the codex-level statement for 01/03.
“The Comma Johanneum is in the earliest Greek tradition.”
Unsupported / overclaim1 John 5:7–8 is extant in early Greek witnesses with the short reading (Spirit, water, blood). The explicit heavenly Trinity wording of the Comma is not attested in Greek before the sixteenth century; it entered some Latin lines and late Greek retro-translations.
“The Qurʾān has no manuscript variation.”
Unsupported / overclaimThe Uthmanic Text Type is highly uniform, but published stemmatics (Cook; Sidky; van Putten) report on the order of ~35–40 regional rasm differences among the four ʿUthmānic exemplar traditions — not wholesale content rewrites, but not zero graphic variation. Early palimpsests such as Ṣanʿāʾ 1 preserve a lower text that is not UT.
“From about 650 CE the Uthmanic text type is already stable.”
Supported (within our scope)Sidky and van Putten’s archetype framing treats UT as stable from the seventh century onward for the rasm tradition they model — while allowing later scribal noise and regional graphic differences, not a claim of byte-identical copies everywhere.
“Illustrative Manuscripts proves intentional theological corruption at scale.”
Unsupported / overclaimOptional intentional-vs-error tags on some Greek NT units are heuristic and model-assisted — useful for exploration, not proof of motive across the tradition. Most counted units are spelling, word order, or ordinary scribal difference vs SR GNT.
“Our census equals the NA28 apparatus or all Greek manuscripts.”
Out of scope hereOut of scope by design: we mechanically align a bounded CNTR witness set to SR GNT. NA28/ECM/IGNTP record editorial judgments and thousands of witnesses beyond our 1–400 CE illustrative slice.
“The Masoretic Text is identical to what Jesus read.”
Partially trueSecond-Temple and pre-Christian Hebrew witnesses in our corpus (Dead Sea Scrolls, Nash Papyrus) show a largely continuous consonantal tradition alongside spelling diversity and occasional longer or shorter readings in some books. That supports substantial continuity for much of the Hebrew Bible — not byte-identical identity with every medieval Masoretic codex for every verse a first-century reader might have heard.
“The Septuagint is a late Christian invention.”
Unsupported / overclaimJewish Greek Torah and prophetic books are attested on pre-Christian papyri in this site’s Hebrew/LXX slice — e.g. P.Ryl. 458 (Genesis), P.Fouad 266 (Deuteronomy), P.Oxy. 1007 (Exodus) — centuries before Christian recensions and church fathers. Later Christian copies and revisions exist; that is not the same as inventing the whole Greek Old Testament tradition.
“1QIsaᵃ proves the Bible never changed.”
Partially trueThe Great Isaiah Scroll agrees with the Masoretic book of Isaiah far more often than it disagrees — a key data point for stability. It also preserves thousands of spelling variants and documented textual differences elsewhere in the DSS corpus; “remarkable agreement in Isaiah” is not a license to claim zero textual history for the whole Hebrew Bible.
“The Old Testament survives only in medieval manuscripts — nothing earlier exists.”
Unsupported / overclaimWithin our Hebrew/LXX window, material survives from the second century BCE onward (DSS) and from pre-Christian Greek papyri. That does not recover every book on every leaf for every century — but it falsifies the blanket claim that no pre-medieval witnesses exist.